top of page

Publications

                                                                 Articles

​​​​

  • 2025. A new approach to the etymology of Latin testa ‘earthenware’ and tesca/tesqua ‘?’. In Exploring Latin: Structures, Functions, Meaning, Volume 1: Word, ed. Lucie Pultrová and Martina Vaníková, 153–165. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. 

  • 2023. Iterative or stative? New morphosemantic analyses of Latin lūgeō ‘mourn’ and doleō ‘feel pain’. Journal of Latin Linguistics 22: 199–214. 

  • 2022. Lat. disertus revisited. Latomus 81: 591–598. 

  • 2022. ‘Day’ and ‘night’ in Latin: The formation of temporal adjectives and adverbs. Indo-European Linguistics 10: 129–150. 

  • 2021. The resultative marker *-(e)u̯- in Latin: Adjectives in -vus/-uus, some u-stem nouns, and perfects with -v/u-. In Die italischen Sprachen: Neue linguistische und philologische Aspekte, ed. Satoko Hisatsugi, 65–84. Hamburg: Baar-Verlag.

  • 2021. On the spread of the Indo-European nasal infix to perfects and perfect participles in Latin: An analysis with special focus on the semantics of verbs. In Linguisticae Dissertationes. Current Perspectives on Latin Grammar, Lexicon and Pragmatics: Selected Papers from the 20th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, June 17–21, 2019), ed. Antonio María Martín Rodríguez, 33–44. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.

  • 2020. Roman king Numa as an Indo-European distributor. Glotta 96: 131147.

  • 2019 [2021] (with Teigo Onishi). How to handle the Proto-Indo-European suffix *-eh2- in Latin compounds: Tībīcen-type and armiger-type treatments. Historische Sprachforschung 132: 208–224.

  • 2019. Fors and fortūna: Linguistic and cultural aspects. In Lemmata Linguistica Latina, Volume I: Words and Sounds, ed. Nigel Holmes, Marijke Ottink, Josine Schrickx, and Maria Selig, 192–205. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.

  • 2019. A linguistic approach to the prayer to Venus in Lucretius’ first proem: Māvors and poetic tradition. In QAZZU warrai: Anatolian and Indo-European Studies in Honor of Kazuhiko Yoshida, ed. Adam Alvah Catt, Ronald I. Kim, and Brent Vine, 256–266.  Ann Arbor and New York: Beech Stave Press.

  • 2018. The humī-rule in Italic. In Vina Diem Celebrent: Studies in Linguistics and Philology in Honor of Brent Vine, ed. Dieter Gunkel, Stephanie Jamison, Angelo O. Mercado, and Kazuhiko Yoshida, 276–287. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.

  • 2017. New thoughts on Umbrian nuvime and Oscan maimas: Syncope and glide treatment in Sabellic. Incontri Linguistici 40: 93–106

  • 2017. Māvors vis-à-vis Mārs: Linguistic history and cultural background. Glotta 93: 135–153.

  • 2016 (with Teigo Onishi). Inseparable etymologies: Latin crīnis, Greek κορέω, and related Germanic forms. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, ed. David M. Goldstein, Stephanie W. Jamison, and Brent Vine, 131–142. Bremen: Hempen.

  • 2016. On syncope of u-vocalism in Sabellic: Syllable structure, glide treatment, and other phonological issues. Indogermanische Forschungen 121: 199211.

  • 2016. Elision and prosodic hiatus between monosyllabic words in Plautus and Terence. In Sahasram Ati Srajas: Indo-Iranian and Indo-European Studies in Honor of Stephanie W. Jamison, ed. Dieter Gunkel, Joshua T. Katz, Brent Vine, and Michael Weiss, 264–275. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.

  • 2015. On Latin strāgulum and strāgēs: -g- and analogy. In Words and Dictionaries: A Festschrift for Professor Stanisław Stachowski on the Occasion of His 85th Birthday, ed. Elżbieta Mańczak-Wohlfeld and Barbara Podolak, 231–236. Cracow: Jagiellonian University Press.

  • 2014. Vowel lengthening in the Latin nominal lexicon: Innovation and inheritance. Historische Sprachforschung 127: 228–248.

 

  • 2014. On accent in the Italic languages: Nature, position, and history. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 131: 161–192.

 

  • 2013. On the phonological mystery in Latin suspīciō: A trick of suspectus? In Tokyo University Linguistic Papers 33 as Festschrift for Professor Hiroshi Kumamoto, ed. Tooru Hayashi, Masato Kobayashi, and Yoshiki Nishimura, 187–203. Tokyo: Department of Linguistics, University of Tokyo.

 

  • 2012. Vowel reduction and deletion in Sabellic: A synchronic and diachronic interface. In The Sound of Indo-European: Phonetics, Phonemics, and Morphophonemics, ed. Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead, Thomas Olander, Birgit Anette Olsen, and Jens Elmegård Rasmussen, 381–398. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press and University of Copenhagen.

 

  • 2011 [2012]. Notes on glide treatment in Latin orthography and phonology: -iciō, servus, aiō. Historische Sprachforschung 124: 193–209.

  • 2011. A phonological factor in Mārs’ lexical genealogy. In Alessandria – Rivista di Glottologia 5 as Atti del Convegno Internazionale “Le lingue dell’Italia antica: iscrizioni, testi, grammatica” in memoriam Helmut Rix (1926-2004), 7–8 marzo 2011, Libera Università di Lingue e Comunicazione IULM, ed. Giovanna Rocca, 233–245. Milan: Edizioni dell’Orso.

  • 2011. Syncope in Latin: A historical restatement of its conditions. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 8: 1–41.

  • 2011. On the chronology of vowel contraction in Latin. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, ed. Stephanie W. Jamison, H. Craig Melchert, and Brent Vine, 181–191. Bremen: Hempen Verlag.

  • 2010 [2011]. Patterns of vowel reduction in Latin: Phonetics and phonology. Historische Sprachforschung 123: 217–257.

  • 2010. Chronology between word-internal and word-final vowel reduction in Latin. Incontri Linguistici 33: 167–178.

  • 2009. The orthographic and phonological interpretation of the Oscan praenomen marahis and related forms. In East and West: Papers in Indo-European Studies, ed. Kazuhiko Yoshida and Brent Vine, 163–179. Bremen: Hempen Verlag.

  • 2006. Umbrian restatu: A restitution. Indogermanische Forschungen 111: 182–191.

  • 2006. Latin -issimus. Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 11: 105–113. (Orig. in Kyoto University Linguistic Research 19: 33–41, 2000.)

  • 2005. Superlative suffixes *-ismo- and *-ism̥mo- in Sabellian languages. Glotta 81: 160–183. 

  • 2004 [2005]. Development of the prevocalic * in Latin. Glotta 80: 231–250.

  • 2001. Superlative suffixes in Indo-European and Latin: Relation to ordinal numbers and process of variation. Kyoto University Linguistic Research 20: 37–50.

                                                                 Reviews

  • 2019. Romain Garnier, La dérivation inverse en latin (Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck, 2016). Gnomon 91: 367–370.

  • 2017. Katherine McDonald, Oscan in Southern Italy and Sicily: Evaluating Language Contact in a Fragmentary Corpus (Cambridge University Press, 2015)The Classical Review 67: 66–68.

 

  • 2013. Emmanuel Dupraz, Sabellian Demonstratives: Forms and Functions (Brill, 2012). Kratylos 58: 47–57.

 

  • 2012. Sophie Van Laer, La préverbation en latin: étude des préverbes ad-, in-, ob- et per- dans la poésie républicaine et augustéenne (Éditions Latomus, 2010). The Classical Review 62: 479–481.

 

  • 2009. J. N. Adams, The Regional Diversification of Latin 200 BC–AD 600 (Cambridge University Press, 2007). Indo-European Studies Bulletin 14: 45–50.

 

Dictionary Contribution

  • In progress. Contribution to 白水社ラテン語辞典 The Hakuisuisha Latin-Japanese Dictionary, ed. T. Nakayama, et al. Tokyo: Hakusuisha.

bottom of page